
Company A was rapidly hiring for specialized roles across multiple brands, including international channel sales, brand merchandising, and performance marketing. With North America now the decisive market for K-beauty, the required hiring speed, quality, and number of open roles far exceeded the recruiting team’s capacity, and most interviews fell to functional leaders. As interviews piled up, the leader overseeing hiring at Company A kept running into the same problems.
The three problems converged into one risk. Company A had no guarantee that every interviewer read candidates against the same standard. For a recruiting team responsible for company-wide hiring quality, that was a problem to solve.
The answer Company A found was not a tool that took better interview notes. It was an analysis tool that reads a candidate’s competencies against the same standard, no matter who conducts the interview. So the company skipped general-purpose meeting note-takers and ran its interviews on Telta Interview Pro, built for hiring interviews from the start.
Each interview starts with one click. While the interview runs, Interview Pro converts the conversation to text in real time and automatically separates interviewer and candidate speech. Interviewers could stop taking notes, hold eye contact, and stay with the conversation.
The moment a performance marketing candidate says, “I doubled ROAS,” the AI classifies that statement as a job competency signal, flags it as a point that needs checking, and suggests a follow-up question that fits the context. Interviewers could pick up that thread and ask, “What did you personally design or change in that improvement, and how did you judge that it was what worked?” That pushes past the performance number and into the judgment that produced it. The interview shifted from checking years of experience to checking what the candidate actually did. When the interview ends, Interview Pro delivers a QnA summary of the questions and answers along with an AI-corrected transcript, so the evidence behind an evaluation is what the candidate actually said, not what the interviewer remembered.
Evaluations held steady across interviewers because the role-specific competency standards behind each report were built first. Telta identified the core roles Company A was hiring for, then built the competency assessment standards for each role by analyzing job descriptions from the companies that execute that work best worldwide and setting out the competencies each role genuinely requires as behavioral indicators. The standard came from how the role actually works in the global market, not from one company's preferences.
There is a reason the benchmark companies differ by role. Channel sales standards have to come from consumer goods leaders running global distribution networks, and performance marketing standards from companies that have built growth on data, or they will not match what the role actually looks like. So Company A evaluated candidates on whether they had done the tasks the role actually involves and how they behaved doing them, rather than on a label like “international sales experience.”
The report organizes each candidate’s statements against the Skill-set built this way. The standard sits in behavioral data drawn from how leading global companies actually work, not in an individual interviewer’s instinct. That is where Company A’s added evidence and confidence in interview evaluation came from.
Request the Job Competency Report and you receive the candidate’s statements organized against those standards, along with a Fit Score. That let the recruiting team gauge, from the candidate’s own words, whether the results they described came from their own hypotheses, testing, and judgment.
The biggest change was consistency. The same standard applied regardless of an interviewer’s experience or how they were feeling that day, and several interviewers could compare candidates they had met across different brands on the same base of transcript data. That moved Company A closer to a structured interview, where whoever runs the interview asks and evaluates against the same standard. Recruiters responsible for company-wide hiring could look at hiring quality by role through a single standard, and when they reported a hiring decision to executives, they could explain it with what the candidate actually said and the competency signals caught at that moment, not with “it felt right.”
Adopting Interview Pro required no change to the existing hiring process. Company A stated the use of an AI tool in its job postings, signed up, and used it from the next interview on. That was enough.
The faster an organization grows, the faster interview volume climbs, and the greater the risk that standards scatter across interviewers. Start your next interview with Interview Pro. Interviewers focus on the conversation. Evaluation standards stay consistent.